Small-scale spatial resolution of the soil phytolith record in a rainforest and a dry forest in Costa Rica

Small-scale spatial resolution of the soil phytolith record in a rainforest and a dry forest in Costa Rica

Crifò, C. and Strömberg, C.A., 2019. Small-scale spatial resolution of the soil phytolith record in a Neotropical rainforest and a dry forest in Costa Rica: applications to the deep-time fossil phytolith record. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2019.03.008

Our objective was to define guidelines for the collection of soil samples to conduct phytolith modern analogue studies applicable to pre-Quaternary phytolith assemblages from paleosols. Phytolith analysis is a well-established tool in archaeology and Quaternary paleoecology and has become a source of data for deep-time paleoecological studies in the last 15  years. However, soil phytolith inventories from extant vegetation types, representing modern analogues suffer from several methodological shortcomings limiting inter-study comparisons, and the development of a single, and repeatable protocol for soil sample collection.

We addressed the following questions:

1) Do phytoliths from the lower portion of the A-horizon (more commonly preserved in paleosols) reflect standing vegetation equally well as the upper A-horizon?

2) Is current paleosol sampling methodology (i.e. point soil samples) appropriate to capture standing vegetation cover, or should we combine multiple soil samples within a small area to capture spatial vegetation variability (as it is commonly done in modern analogue studies)?

To answer these questions, we compared phytolith assemblages from upper vs. lower soil A-horizons, and composites vs. single phytolith assemblages from 10 × 10 m quadrats in a dry and rainforest in Costa Rica.

Results suggest that the typical approach in deep-time paleoecology of taking point samples from the lower A-horizon of paleosols is valid for the two studied vegetation types (rainforest and dry forest). We further justify this approach because a) the upper portion of the A-horizon is often truncated by erosion in paleosols, and b) point samples are time-averaged, and combining multiple point samples likely amplifies time-averaging rather than providing more accurate reconstructions of the vegetation at a given time.

IPS
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.